These tools work very similarly to how they would in an image editor too, only instead of being used to select specific areas of a picture, SpectraLayers’ tools allow you to select specific time ranges of frequencies on a spectrogram. Is there any reason Steinberg won’t provide demos on release dates? I sure hope this can be solved because I did my best to avoid this happening.Steinberg SpectraLayers Pro 8: Performance and verdictĭespite being an audio editor, SpectraLayers borrows many concepts from the world of digital image editing, such as marquee selection tools, non-continuous selections and, of course, layers. Unfortunately, very disappointed to report instant crashes in numerous processes (SpectraLayers Pro 7 is fine for it’s similar processes: You should be good without AVX support as well. It doesn’t require Metal graphics, still the same OpenGL 3.3 requirements. If your mac officially support macOS Mojave, you’ll be good in term of compatibility. Does it, like Cubase 11, require Metal Graphics?Īre there any other new changes that could affect it’s compatibility with older systems? (Running Mohave 10.14.6).It would be so much easier if Steinberg allowed us to demo. I want to make sure this is still the case and that there are no surprises after purchase. Is there any change in System Requirements for Pro 8 from Version 7? There was an issue at the beginning with Pro 7 that some functions didn’t work on Macs that couldn’t process AVX instructions. Just purchased SpectraLayers 8 Pro upgrade upon advice (From Now Available post)
0 kommentar(er)
